Flow docs updated (11 files): - Delivery Confirmation: reversed actor roles (buyer generates, seller verifies), fixed endpoint paths (/delivery-code/generate, /delivery-code/verify) - Passkey (WebAuthn): removed stub/simulated-key claims; real @simplewebauthn/server attestation is implemented; refresh tokens are persisted - Dispute: corrected resolve schema (action enum), removed non-existent statuses, documented security gaps (no role guards on status/resolve/assign), route shadowing, all socket events are TODO stubs - Seller Offer: corrected all endpoint paths, removed 'active' status, documented withdraw dead code, missing seller history page, select-offer notification gap - Notification: corrected mark-all-read method+path, fixed GET /:id broken lookup, added unread-count-update socket event - Authentication: corrected rate limiter (counts all attempts), axios 403 not handled, deleteAccount wrong endpoint bug, changePassword no UI - Password Reset: corrected 6-digit code (not 8), documented no-complexity gap on reset-with-code vs token reset - Payment Flow DePay: /create→/save, removed phantom sub-routes, SIM_ bypass risk, PaymentProvider type gap, getProviderIntentEndpoint routing bug - Payment Flow SHKeeper: removed phantom polling endpoint, fixed release/refund paths - Purchase Request: added pending_payment/active statuses, fixed sellers/attachments endpoints, corrected socket events, PUT→PATCH bug - Escrow: documented dispute resolve does not touch escrow, route shadowing, confirm-delivery auth gap Issues created (35 files in Issues/): - 9 security issues (critical) including: dispute privilege escalation ×4, unauthenticated payment/scanner endpoints ×2, SIM_ production bypass, confirm-delivery ownership gap - 26 additional major/critical bugs covering broken endpoints, missing features, data integrity gaps, and frontend-backend mismatches Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
42 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
issue: "024"
|
|
title: "POST /api/auth/reset-password-with-code accepts weak passwords — no complexity validation"
|
|
severity: major
|
|
domain: auth
|
|
labels: [backend, security, bug]
|
|
status: open
|
|
created: 2026-05-29
|
|
source: Doc vs Code Audit 2026-05-29
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# 🟠 POST /api/auth/reset-password-with-code accepts weak passwords — no complexity validation
|
|
|
|
**Severity:** major
|
|
**Domain:** auth
|
|
**Labels:** backend, security, bug
|
|
|
|
## Description
|
|
|
|
`POST /api/auth/reset-password-with-code` has **no `passwordResetValidation` middleware** (`authRoutes.ts` line ~54-57). The controller only validates that email, code, and password fields are present, and that the code is 6 digits.
|
|
|
|
Passwords like `'123456'`, `'aaaaaa'`, or `'password'` are accepted.
|
|
|
|
By contrast, the legacy `POST /api/auth/reset-password` (token-based) is wired with `passwordResetValidation` which enforces `/^(?=.*[a-z])(?=.*[A-Z])(?=.*\d)/` — at least one uppercase, one lowercase, one digit.
|
|
|
|
## Current Behavior
|
|
|
|
`POST /api/auth/reset-password-with-code` with `{ email, code: "123456", password: "aaaaaa" }` → 200, password reset to weak value.
|
|
|
|
## Expected Behavior
|
|
|
|
Apply `passwordResetValidation` (or equivalent inline validation) to `reset-password-with-code` as well.
|
|
|
|
## Affected Files
|
|
|
|
- `backend/src/routes/authRoutes.ts` — line ~54-57, add `passwordResetValidation` middleware
|
|
- `backend/src/shared/middleware/authValidation.ts` — `passwordResetValidation` definition
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- [Doc vs Code Audit Report](../09%20-%20Audits/Doc%20vs%20Code%20Audit%20Report%20-%202026-05-29.md) — Finding M6
|