Files
nick-doc/Issues/ISSUE-018-trezor-no-frontend-implementation.md
Siavash Sameni a1f056e6a5 docs: align flow docs with code reality + create 35 implementation issue files
Flow docs updated (11 files):
- Delivery Confirmation: reversed actor roles (buyer generates, seller verifies),
  fixed endpoint paths (/delivery-code/generate, /delivery-code/verify)
- Passkey (WebAuthn): removed stub/simulated-key claims; real @simplewebauthn/server
  attestation is implemented; refresh tokens are persisted
- Dispute: corrected resolve schema (action enum), removed non-existent statuses,
  documented security gaps (no role guards on status/resolve/assign), route shadowing,
  all socket events are TODO stubs
- Seller Offer: corrected all endpoint paths, removed 'active' status, documented
  withdraw dead code, missing seller history page, select-offer notification gap
- Notification: corrected mark-all-read method+path, fixed GET /:id broken lookup,
  added unread-count-update socket event
- Authentication: corrected rate limiter (counts all attempts), axios 403 not handled,
  deleteAccount wrong endpoint bug, changePassword no UI
- Password Reset: corrected 6-digit code (not 8), documented no-complexity gap on
  reset-with-code vs token reset
- Payment Flow DePay: /create→/save, removed phantom sub-routes, SIM_ bypass risk,
  PaymentProvider type gap, getProviderIntentEndpoint routing bug
- Payment Flow SHKeeper: removed phantom polling endpoint, fixed release/refund paths
- Purchase Request: added pending_payment/active statuses, fixed sellers/attachments
  endpoints, corrected socket events, PUT→PATCH bug
- Escrow: documented dispute resolve does not touch escrow, route shadowing, confirm-delivery auth gap

Issues created (35 files in Issues/):
- 9 security issues (critical) including: dispute privilege escalation ×4,
  unauthenticated payment/scanner endpoints ×2, SIM_ production bypass,
  confirm-delivery ownership gap
- 26 additional major/critical bugs covering broken endpoints, missing features,
  data integrity gaps, and frontend-backend mismatches

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-29 14:47:49 +04:00

54 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown

---
issue: "018"
title: "Trezor Safekeeping has zero frontend implementation — all backend endpoints unreachable from UI"
severity: critical
domain: trezor
labels: [frontend, missing-feature]
status: open
created: 2026-05-29
source: Doc vs Code Audit 2026-05-29
---
# 🔴 Trezor Safekeeping has zero frontend implementation — all backend endpoints unreachable from UI
**Severity:** critical
**Domain:** trezor
**Labels:** frontend, missing-feature
## Description
A comprehensive search of all `.ts` and `.tsx` files in `frontend/src/` finds **zero calls** to any Trezor backend endpoint. There is no:
- Trezor registration page
- xpub input UI
- Trezor Connect SDK import
- Admin Trezor signing panel
- Any action calling `/api/trezor/*`
The only Trezor reference in the entire frontend is a brand logo in `wallet-icons.ts`.
The documented 12-step challenge-sign-submit flow exists entirely in the backend but has no frontend surface at any step.
Additionally, `confirmReleaseTx` and `confirmRefundTx` in `frontend/src/actions/payment.ts` post `{ txHash, ...extra }` with **no `trezor` object** (message + signature). With `TREZOR_SAFEKEEPING_REQUIRED=true`, every admin release/refund from the UI will be rejected by the backend's `assertTrezorSignatureForOperation` guard.
## Current Behavior
- No UI exists for Trezor registration
- Admin release/refund with `TREZOR_SAFEKEEPING_REQUIRED=true` always fails (missing signature payload)
- All Trezor API endpoints are only testable via curl/Postman
## Expected Behavior
A complete frontend implementation covering:
1. Trezor registration page (xpub input, challenge-sign-submit flow)
2. Operation signing UI for admin release/refund (call `POST /api/trezor/operation-message`, prompt sign, attach `trezor` object to confirm body)
## Affected Files
- `frontend/src/actions/payment.ts``confirmReleaseTx`, `confirmRefundTx` missing `trezor` field
- Missing: Trezor registration page component
- Missing: Admin Trezor signing integration in dispute/payment admin panels
## References
- [Doc vs Code Audit Report](../09%20-%20Audits/Doc%20vs%20Code%20Audit%20Report%20-%202026-05-29.md) — Findings C31, C32