Remaining docs updated to match code (the docs that the first pass had not covered):
- Flows: Chat, Referral, Rating, Registration, Google OAuth, Negotiation, Payout,
Trezor Safekeeping — corrected endpoints, socket events, status enums, auth gaps
- API Reference: User API, Trezor API — admin route prefix/verb/status corrections,
added undocumented endpoints (ton-proof challenge, profile email verify,
GET /trezor/account, POST /trezor/verify-operation)
- Data Models: Chat, Notification, Payment, PointTransaction, User — corrected
enums (PaymentProvider, escrowState, PointTransaction.type, User.status),
90-day notification TTL, soft-delete semantics, wallet fields
Trezor "zero frontend" finding (audit C31/C32) corrected as STALE:
- Verified current code HAS a full frontend Trezor implementation (admin/trezor
page, TrezorSettingsView, trezorConnector via @trezor/connect-web,
TrezorSignDialog, actions/trezor.ts building the {message,signature} object)
- Fixed Trezor Safekeeping Flow doc (removed false "no frontend" warnings)
- Reclassified ISSUE-012 as invalid/superseded with explanation
Issue set reconciled to a single canonical numbering (ISSUE-001..054):
- Adopted the comprehensive 51-issue set (long-slug, fully indexed)
- Removed 35 superseded short-slug duplicates from the first pass
- Removed a duplicate ISSUE-046 file
- Added 3 issues the 51-set lacked: ISSUE-052 (completed-not-counted-in-stats),
ISSUE-053 (axios 401-only interceptor), ISSUE-054 (rate limiter counts all attempts)
- Regenerated Issues Index: 53 open (14 critical, 39 major) + 1 invalid
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
issue, title, severity, domain, labels, status, created, source
| issue | title | severity | domain | labels | status | created | source | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 051 | Self-referral prevention is absent — users can refer themselves for points | major | Points |
|
open | 2026-05-29 | Doc vs Code Audit 2026-05-29 |
🟠 Self-referral prevention is absent — users can refer themselves for points
Severity: major Domain: Points Labels: security, bug, backend, major, points
Description
authController.ts referral attribution logic at lines 704 and 1132 has no self-referral check. Any user who obtains their own referral code and uses it during sign-up will receive a referral reward on their own account.
Current Behavior
Self-referral is possible. Users can earn referral rewards by using their own code.
Expected Behavior
Before applying referral attribution, verify that the referrer's userId !== the new user's userId. If they match, skip the reward.
Affected Files
backend/src/controllers/authController.ts