docs: add notification and concurrency test procedures

This commit is contained in:
Siavash Sameni
2026-06-06 10:57:44 +04:00
parent 9267961909
commit bee91dd01f
6 changed files with 552 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
---
title: Notification Assertion Procedure
tags: [testing, notifications, e2e, socket-io]
created: 2026-06-06
---
# Notification Assertion Procedure
Every E2E business step must verify notifications. A test step is incomplete
until notification persistence and, where practical, real-time delivery are
validated.
Related docs:
- [[04 - Flows/Notification Flow]]
- [[03 - API Reference/Notification API]]
- [[Escrow Marketplace E2E Procedure]]
## Principle
For each state-changing action, assert notifications for the expected recipients.
If the product currently does not emit a notification for that action, the E2E
must record a notification coverage gap. Silent missing notifications should not
be treated as a pass.
## Notification Channels To Check
| Channel | Required? | How |
|---|---|---|
| Persistence | Always | `GET /api/notifications`, `GET /api/notifications/unread-count` |
| Socket push | Required when runner has sockets enabled | Listen for `new-notification` on `user-<userId>` |
| Badge count sync | Required for read/mark-read steps | `unread-count-update` socket event or count endpoint |
| Email/push | Not required today | Planned digest/push work is not implemented |
## Baseline Before a Scenario
For every actor:
1. Authenticate.
2. Read unread count:
```http
GET /api/notifications/unread-count
```
3. Read latest notifications:
```http
GET /api/notifications?page=1&limit=5
```
4. Store:
- `baselineUnreadCount`;
- latest notification id;
- timestamp.
Do this before creating purchase requests or offers so later assertions can
distinguish new notifications from old ones.
## Per-Step Assertion Algorithm
After each action:
1. Identify expected recipients.
2. Poll each recipient's notifications for up to the notification SLA window.
3. Assert at least one new notification matching the action.
4. Assert unread count increased by the expected number, unless the notification
is intentionally auto-read.
5. Assert `actionUrl` or `relatedId` points to the correct request/payment/offer
where the notification type supports it.
6. If socket instrumentation is active, assert the same notification arrived via
`new-notification`.
7. Record `notificationLatencyMs = notification.createdAt - actionCompletedAt`
or runner-observed first-seen time.
Suggested polling:
| Target | Value |
|---|---:|
| poll interval | `500 ms` |
| timeout | `10 s` for local/dev API notifications |
| hard failure threshold | `30 s` |
## Expected Marketplace Notifications
| Action | Expected recipients | Expected category/type |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer creates request | eligible sellers | `purchase_request` / new request or opportunity |
| Seller submits offer | buyer | `offer` / new offer |
| Buyer accepts offer | selected seller | `offer` / accepted |
| Buyer accepts offer | non-selected sellers | `offer` / rejected or no-longer-selected, when implemented |
| Payment intent created | buyer | `payment` / pending or started, when implemented |
| Scanner confirms payment | buyer, selected seller | `payment` / confirmed or funded |
| Seller marks delivery | buyer | `delivery` / delivery submitted |
| Buyer confirms delivery | selected seller | `delivery` / delivery confirmed |
| Dispute raised | buyer, seller, admin/mediator | `delivery`/`payment`/`system` dispute hold, when implemented |
| Release/refund | buyer, seller | `payment` / release or refund |
Known current gaps from existing docs:
- `pending_payment` and `seller_paid` status changes are not covered by
`NotificationService.notifyRequestStatusChanged`.
- Dispute service notification emits are TODO stubs in the dashboard dispute path.
These known gaps should still be reported by the E2E runner as gaps, not ignored.
## Evidence Format
For each step, append a notification assertion record:
```json
{
"step": "seller_offer_created",
"recipient": "buyer",
"recipientUserId": "<id>",
"expected": true,
"observed": true,
"latencyMs": 742,
"unreadBefore": 3,
"unreadAfter": 4,
"notificationId": "<id>",
"category": "offer",
"actionUrl": "/dashboard/request/<requestId>",
"socketObserved": true,
"gap": null
}
```
For a known gap:
```json
{
"step": "payment_intent_created",
"recipient": "buyer",
"expected": true,
"observed": false,
"gap": "No notification emitted for pending_payment status",
"linkedDoc": "Notification Flow#Purchase request status coverage gap"
}
```
## Pass/Fail Rules
| Condition | Result |
|---|---|
| Expected notification appears within SLA | pass |
| Expected notification appears after SLA but before hard timeout | warning |
| Expected notification never appears and no approved gap exists | fail |
| Notification appears for wrong user | fail |
| Notification exists but has wrong request/payment/offer id | fail |
| Socket missing but persistence exists | warning unless socket coverage is the target |
| Unread count inconsistent with persisted notification | fail |
## Performance Metrics
Notification metrics must be included in concurrency profiles:
- notification persistence latency p50/p95/p99;
- socket delivery latency p50/p95/p99;
- notification failures by action and recipient;
- unread count mismatch rate;
- duplicate notification rate;
- Mongo notification insert error rate.