docs: complete code-reality alignment for remaining docs + reconcile issue set

Remaining docs updated to match code (the docs that the first pass had not covered):
- Flows: Chat, Referral, Rating, Registration, Google OAuth, Negotiation, Payout,
  Trezor Safekeeping — corrected endpoints, socket events, status enums, auth gaps
- API Reference: User API, Trezor API — admin route prefix/verb/status corrections,
  added undocumented endpoints (ton-proof challenge, profile email verify,
  GET /trezor/account, POST /trezor/verify-operation)
- Data Models: Chat, Notification, Payment, PointTransaction, User — corrected
  enums (PaymentProvider, escrowState, PointTransaction.type, User.status),
  90-day notification TTL, soft-delete semantics, wallet fields

Trezor "zero frontend" finding (audit C31/C32) corrected as STALE:
- Verified current code HAS a full frontend Trezor implementation (admin/trezor
  page, TrezorSettingsView, trezorConnector via @trezor/connect-web,
  TrezorSignDialog, actions/trezor.ts building the {message,signature} object)
- Fixed Trezor Safekeeping Flow doc (removed false "no frontend" warnings)
- Reclassified ISSUE-012 as invalid/superseded with explanation

Issue set reconciled to a single canonical numbering (ISSUE-001..054):
- Adopted the comprehensive 51-issue set (long-slug, fully indexed)
- Removed 35 superseded short-slug duplicates from the first pass
- Removed a duplicate ISSUE-046 file
- Added 3 issues the 51-set lacked: ISSUE-052 (completed-not-counted-in-stats),
  ISSUE-053 (axios 401-only interceptor), ISSUE-054 (rate limiter counts all attempts)
- Regenerated Issues Index: 53 open (14 critical, 39 major) + 1 invalid

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

04 - Flows/Dispute Flow.md

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ related_apis: ["POST /api/disputes", "POST /api/disputes/:id/assign", "POST /api
 audit: "2026-05-29 — corrected against source: Dispute.ts, DisputeService.ts, routes/disputeRoutes.ts (dashboard), services/dispute/disputeRoutes.ts (release-hold), app.ts. Previous version had wrong resolution schema, invented status values, missing security issues, and incorrect socket-event description."
 ---
 
+> **Last updated:** 2026-05-29 — aligned with code (see Doc vs Code Audit Report)
+
 # Dispute Flow
 
 When something goes wrong (item not delivered, wrong item, seller misbehaviour), either party can open a **dispute**. A three-way chat (buyer, seller, admin mediator) is created automatically. After evidence is gathered, the admin **resolves** the dispute — selecting an action such as refund, replacement, compensation, warning, or ban.