# T0.0 — Example report (delete me) > This file shows the report template filled in. Use it as a reference when writing real reports. Do not edit this file when claiming tasks — copy it to `T-report.md` and edit the copy. The filename prefix `_` keeps it sorted at the top. **Status:** Pending Review **Agent:** claude-haiku-4-5 **Started:** 2026-05-11T14:22:00Z **Completed:** 2026-05-11T15:08:00Z **Commit:** 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 **PRD:** ../PRD-wire-format-v2.md ## What I changed - `crates/wzp-proto/src/packet.rs:20-47` — Renamed existing `MediaHeader` to `MediaHeaderV1`. - `crates/wzp-proto/src/packet.rs:50-110` — Added v2 `MediaHeader` (16 B, byte-aligned) with `write_to` / `read_from`. - `crates/wzp-proto/src/packet.rs:1450-1480` — Added `media_header_v2_roundtrip` test. ## Why these choices Followed steps T0.0.1 through T0.0.5 without deviation. `MediaType::from_wire` returning `Option` (not `Result`) matches the existing pattern in `CodecId::from_wire`; chose consistency over typed errors here. ## Deviations from the task spec None. ## Verification output ``` $ cargo test -p wzp-proto media_header_v2_roundtrip Compiling wzp-proto v0.1.0 Finished `test` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 4.2s Running unittests src/lib.rs running 1 test test packet::tests::media_header_v2_roundtrip ... ok test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 318 filtered out ``` ``` $ cargo build --workspace Compiling wzp-proto v0.1.0 ... Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 12.8s ``` ## Test summary - Tests added: 1 (`media_header_v2_roundtrip`) - Tests modified: 0 - Workspace test count before: 272 / after: 273 - `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings`: pass - `cargo fmt --all -- --check`: pass ## Risks / follow-ups `MediaType` is referenced from the new `MediaHeader::read_from` but is implemented separately in T1.2. T1.2 must land before any other crate can import the v2 type. Status board reflects this — T1.2 should be picked up next. ## Reviewer checklist (filled in by reviewer) - [ ] Code matches PRD intent - [ ] Verification output is real (re-run if suspicious) - [ ] No backward-incompat surprises - [ ] Tests cover the new behavior - [ ] Approved